ItemsAdder furniture entities and namespaced cosmetics

Entity choice affects the review

ItemsAdder's furniture documentation distinguishes item_display, armor_stand and item_frame furniture. It describes display transformations for item_display and surface-oriented placement for item_frame. Read the definition supplied with a pack before assuming that two visually similar pieces use the same behavior.

The documentation also distinguishes visual transformations from hitbox configuration. A model that looks correctly positioned can still need a collision review. Use the author's configuration and documentation for your installed version rather than copying a different furniture entity's settings.

Check geometry, not just the thumbnail

The ItemsAdder documentation discusses hitbox dimensions and offsets, including a width/length restriction for item_frame furniture. These details matter when reviewing wide tables, wall decorations or objects that should remain passable. They should not be generalized into a promise about an untested pack.

• Identify the furniture entity in the supplied configuration.
• Write down intended wall, ceiling or floor placement.
• Check model position and hitbox alignment separately on the target stack.

Cosmetic references include a namespace

HMCCosmetics documents ItemsAdder material references in the form itemsadder:<namespace>:<item>. Keep the namespace with the item identifier when reviewing the handoff between configurations; a display name is not a substitute for that reference.

This integration connects the item definition to the cosmetics system. It does not show which slots, animations or pack-specific features are supported. Ask for the supplied cosmetics configuration and constraints before choosing the pack. Installation steps remain in the canonical Docs.